{"id":256233,"date":"2022-09-12T19:40:37","date_gmt":"2022-09-12T16:40:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wmmaa.org\/revisao-de-roubo-daniel-rodriguez-x-li-jingliang-no-ufc-279\/"},"modified":"2022-09-12T19:40:37","modified_gmt":"2022-09-12T16:40:37","slug":"revisao-de-roubo-daniel-rodriguez-x-li-jingliang-no-ufc-279","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wmmaa.org\/pt-pt\/revisao-de-roubo-daniel-rodriguez-x-li-jingliang-no-ufc-279\/","title":{"rendered":"Revis\u00e3o de roubo: Daniel Rodriguez x Li Jingliang no UFC 279"},"content":{"rendered":"

Poucas coisas enfurecem mais os f\u00e3s de MMA do que uma luta sendo pontuada incorretamente, embora o termo “roubo” tenda a ser usado de forma descuidada e muitas vezes \u00e9 impregnado de preconceito. Com Robbery Review, vamos dar uma olhada em lutas controversas e determinar se os ju\u00edzes foram criticados com raz\u00e3o por sua decis\u00e3o ou se os especialistas precisam examinar suas pr\u00f3prias rea\u00e7\u00f5es instintivas.<\/em><\/p>\n

A semana de luta de Li Jingliang no UFC 279 n\u00e3o poderia ter sido muito pior. <\/p>\n

“The Leech” estava programado para enfrentar a lenda do UFC Tony Ferguson na co-luta principal de s\u00e1bado. No entanto, ele n\u00e3o conseguiu enfrentar seu oponente devido \u00e0 confus\u00e3o na forma\u00e7\u00e3o que Khamzat Chimiaev causou. Li n\u00e3o conseguiu apresentar um novo processo \u00e0 m\u00eddia e conversar com jornalistas na coletiva de imprensa de quinta-feira. Isso foi cancelado porque Nate Diaz e Chimaev estavam em uma briga nos bastidores. <\/p>\n

Ent\u00e3o Li entrou na jaula para enfrentar Daniel Rodriguez, um companheiro de peso meio-m\u00e9dio que entrou na luta com uma enorme vantagem de peso depois de inicialmente pesar para uma luta de 180 libras. A luta terminou em uma derrota apertada para Li. <\/p>\n

V\u00e1rios colegas de Li protestaram imediatamente contra a decis\u00e3o dos ju\u00edzes. <\/p>\n

\n
\n

Como Rodriguez venceu essa luta? <\/p>\n

Jingliang \u00e9 melhor ter pago hoje \u00e0 noite!!! #ufc279<\/a><\/p>\n

— Megan Anderson (@MeganAnderson) 11 de setembro de 2022<\/a>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Uauuuuuuu….
Apenas uauuuu. Sanguessuga tem absolutamente zero de sorte#UFC279<\/a><\/p>\n

— Chris Curtis, o homem de a\u00e7\u00e3o (@Actionman513) 11 de setembro de 2022<\/a>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

N\u00e3o vou mentir Se sou um juiz, estou calculando silenciosamente essa diferen\u00e7a de 10 libras e dando para o sanguessuga lol<\/p>\n

— Belal Muhammad (@bullyb170) 11 de setembro de 2022<\/a>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Esses ju\u00edzes est\u00e3o no crack esta noite #UFC279<\/a><\/p>\n

— Kyle Noke (@KyleNoke) 11 de setembro de 2022<\/a>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n

O pr\u00f3prio Li parece estar assumindo a perda no tranco<\/a>mas para o bem dele e dos muitos f\u00e3s que sentiram que ele venceu a luta, somos obrigados a levar este ao laborat\u00f3rio Robbery Review para um olhar mais atento. <\/p>\n

Qual foi o resultado oficial? <\/strong><\/h3>\n

Daniel Rodr\u00edguez def. Li Jingliang por decis\u00e3o dividida. <\/p>\n

Como foi a luta? <\/strong><\/h3>\n

Normalmente, podemos nos concentrar em um round ou em um momento chave em uma luta para nos ajudar a descobrir por que um veredicto \u00e9 controverso, mas como voc\u00ea ver\u00e1 nos scorecards na pr\u00f3xima se\u00e7\u00e3o, cada round nesta luta foi um lance. -up de acordo com os ju\u00edzes, ent\u00e3o vamos ter que cavar fundo aqui. <\/p>\n

Uma observa\u00e7\u00e3o ampla que podemos fazer \u00e9 que Li foi o lutador de apar\u00eancia mais ocupada em todos os tr\u00eas rounds. Sua capacidade de se mover e acompanhar o tamanho maior de Rodriguez era impressionante. Isso poderia ter feito dele um fator significativo no resultado. <\/p>\n

Rodriguez come\u00e7ou seu ataque primeiro no Round 1, passando por chutes baixos de Li para acertar alguns socos limpos na cabe\u00e7a. Li estava indo bem com seus chutes, mas seus socos estavam ficando aqu\u00e9m, o que n\u00e3o era surpreendente, dado o excelente jab de Rodriguez. Levou meia rodada para Li conseguir sua primeira combina\u00e7\u00e3o s\u00f3lida, um 1-2 limpo que apoiou Rodriguez. Cerca de 45 segundos depois, houve outro bom 1-2 de Li e voc\u00ea come\u00e7a a ver qu\u00e3o estreita \u00e9 a diferen\u00e7a entre esses dois. Rodriguez manteve o jab, n\u00e3o querendo morder as in\u00fameras fintas de Li, ent\u00e3o ele aproveitou um chute desleixado de Li, acertando-o com uma esquerda na mand\u00edbula, possivelmente o melhor golpe do round. Rodriguez foi derrubado por um chute baixo, mas saiu ileso e voltou a ficar de p\u00e9. <\/p>\n

Indo para a segunda rodada, voc\u00ea pode ver como o atletismo de Li pode dar problemas a Rodriguez, mas na verdade foi Rodriguez quem manteve o centro do oct\u00f3gono na maior parte do tempo. Eles trocaram socos de relance cedo e Li come\u00e7ou a se aventurar, jogando com for\u00e7a com resultados mistos. Rodriguez continuou a comer uma dieta constante composta por contra-direitos, jabs e chutes baixos que tamb\u00e9m foram acompanhados por Li. Mais socos de Li ficaram aqu\u00e9m, apesar de seus melhores esfor\u00e7os. Li acertou com um belo chute baixo, mas depois deu um soco forte em uma tentativa de soco do Superman. Um grande momento foi vivido por Li quando Rodriguez o pegou com uma r\u00e1pida esquerda e um martelo para a direita. <\/p>\n

Li teve um bom contra-ataque no in\u00edcio do Round 3, embora nenhum dos lutadores tenha aterrissado com muito impacto na troca de abertura. Rodriguez pegou Li entrando com outro contador. A agress\u00e3o de Li come\u00e7ou a trabalhar contra ele quando Rodriguez o acertou com um 1-2. Eles trocaram chutes nas pernas antes de Rodriguez voltar para o jab. Li ainda estava tentando acertar figur\u00f5es, mas com o benef\u00edcio do replay, \u00e9 f\u00e1cil ver que poucos desses arremessos aterrissaram fora do looping ocasional. Rodriguez continuou acertando jab ap\u00f3s jab durante toda a luta, tornando-o uma arma consistente. <\/p>\n

O que os ju\u00edzes disseram? <\/strong><\/h3>\n
\n
\n

#UFC279<\/a> Placar oficial: Li Jingliang x Daniel Rodriguez<\/p>\n

Tudo #UFC279<\/a> Scorecards: https:\/\/t.co\/xGJvFRALDf<\/a> pic.twitter.com\/MhcAjVr72j<\/a><\/p>\n

— UFC News (@UFCNews) 11 de setembro de 2022<\/a>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n

Mike Bell marcou 29-28 Rodriguez. <\/p>\n

Douglas Crosby marcou 29-28 Rodriguez. <\/p>\n

Ron McCarthy marcou 29-28 Li. <\/p>\n

*]Bell marcou as rodadas 1 para Rodriguez, enquanto Crosby foi creditado com a rodada [*********************************************************************************************************************************************************] e rodadas [************************************************************************************************************************************************] para Rod. McCarthy recebeu rodadas de [******************************************************************************************************************************************** ************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************ Bell scored rounds 2 and 3 for Rodriguez, Crosby scored rounds 1 and 2 for Rodriguez, and McCarthy scored rounds 2 and 3 for Li. <\/p>\n

What did the numbers say? <\/strong><\/h3>\n

(Statistics per UFC Stats<\/a>)<\/p>\n

Looking at the official stats only further muddies up the waters. <\/p>\n

Going by significant strike count, Li won Round 1 (27-20), while Rodriguez took Round 2 (34-24) and Round 3 (34-27). Rodriguez also won the head strike battle in every round (R1: 10-7, R2: 19-8, R3: 25-10), which shouldn’t discount the advantage Li had in body and leg strikes, but head strikes are generally considered to be more significant indicators of immediate impact (though tell that to Irene Aldana). <\/p>\n

No knockdowns were scored in the fight. <\/p>\n

Li was credited with a takedown in Round 1 that led to zero offense. <\/p>\n

What did the media say? <\/strong><\/h3>\n

The media was nearly unanimous in scoring the fight for Li, with 20 of 23 scores submitted to MMA Decisions<\/a> in favor of “The Leech.”<\/p>\n

Two media members (including the esteemed Jed Meshew) had it 29-28 for Rodriguez, while MMA Mania’s Drake Riggs had it 30-27 Li. <\/p>\n

What did the people say? <\/strong><\/h3>\n

(Data derived from MMA Decisions and Verdict MMA<\/a>)<\/p>\n

Fans scoring the bout on MMA Decisions also saw this as a clear win for Li, with 68. 2 percent voting for a 29-28 Li score and another 21. 5 percent voting 30-27 Li. <\/p>\n

Going round by round, 81. 8 percent scored Round 1 10-9 for Li and 87. 4 percent scored Round 2 10-9 for Li. A 10-9 score for Rodriguez in Round 3 was the leading choice, but even then only received 57 percent of the vote. <\/p>\n

Voters on the Verdict MMA app scored the fight for Li by a wide margin. <\/p>\n

\n
\n

Li Jingliang defeated Daniel Rodriguez on the Verdict Scorecard and it wasn’t even close. <\/p>\n

Every round on the Verdict Scorecard was in favor of Li Jingliang. #UFC279<\/a> pic.twitter.com\/QEdjgkGsP1<\/a><\/p>\n

— Verdict (@VerdictMMA) September 11, 2022<\/a>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n

That scoring system takes the cumulative total of every submitted fan score (filtering out aberrant scores like random 10-7s if they comprise less than one percent of the total) in every round and divides by the amount of submitted scores to determine the winner of each round and also in totality. <\/p>\n

Verdict scorers gave every round to Li, the first two by over 50 points. That led to a final margin of victory of 142 points for Li, well over the threshold of 100 that I consider to be indicative of a convincing win according to the Verdict scoring system. <\/p>\n

How did I score it? <\/strong><\/h3>\n

* First, the people who booed that fight should stop acting so ridiculous. We’re not seeing tactical, high-level striking anymore. <\/p>\n

Secondly, I scored this one for Rodriguez in the moment, so I had a bias going into this review. <\/p>\n

As I watched the fight over again, my attention shifted to whether Rodriguez’s head hits were as powerful as I remember and whether I was paying enough attention Li’s leg and body work. It was clear that Rodriguez’s leg and body work was better than I thought. Li also managed to land a few great head shots. <\/p>\n

Initially, I felt confident Round 1 was Rodriguez’s and Round 2 was Li’s, but now I can see how Round 1 could be Li’s and Round 2 could be Rodriguez’s! It was a wonderful trip. <\/p>\n

Getting granular with it, I noticed (with the benefit of multiple replays) that several of Li’s power shots that had Rodriguez off-balance didn’t actually connect, though I imagine it’s these moments that played well for Li in the eyes of the live viewer. Several exchanges happened in a flash and were easy to miss. But, I have no doubt that Rodriguez consistently got better head shots than Li and that Li was the winner in that area of fight. <\/p>\n

So I’m standing by my 29-28 score for Rodriguez, with Round 3 being his best frame and the first two being incredibly difficult to score. <\/p>\n

Was it a robbery? <\/strong><\/h3>\n

I believe that a lot of support for Li comes from people who want to see him win. He fought through the last week as a champion, but I don’t mind reading so I will just say that I <\/em> wanted Li to win. After all that he endured. So I understand how one would want to see him rewarded not just for being a company man, but for putting on a strong performance against a bigger fighter and a tough stylistic matchup. <\/p>\n

It also doesn’t help that Rodriguez was at his most methodical, which didn’t necessarily make for a barnburner, though keep in mind that neither fighter trained for the other so they were essentially figuring it out on the fly out there. Fans were not given the best of Rodriguez nor Li and the fighters still delivered an entertaining and competitive contest. <\/p>\n

Competitive is the key word in this Robbery Review discussion, because this was unquestionably a back-and-forth fight where both fighters had their moments without either convincingly pulling away. If you thought Rodriguez’s jab defused Li, fine; if you thought Li earned the nod with his timely aggression, that’s fine too. <\/p>\n

Here’s the point: It doesn’t matter if you scored it for Rodriguez or Li. You don’t have to believe that either of these men won the fight. <\/p>\n

The final verdict<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Not a robbery. <\/p>\n

<\/div><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Poucas coisas enfurecem mais os f\u00e3s de MMA do que uma luta sendo pontuada incorretamente, embora o termo “roubo” tenda a ser usado de forma descuidada e muitas vezes \u00e9 impregnado de preconceito. Com Robbery Review, vamos dar uma olhada em lutas controversas e determinar se os ju\u00edzes foram criticados com raz\u00e3o por sua decis\u00e3o […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":256184,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1170],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wmmaa.org\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256233"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wmmaa.org\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wmmaa.org\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wmmaa.org\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wmmaa.org\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=256233"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/wmmaa.org\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256233\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wmmaa.org\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/256184"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wmmaa.org\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=256233"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wmmaa.org\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=256233"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wmmaa.org\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=256233"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}